Journal

2026-03-11

2026-03-11

Signal

Reviewing the last 3 runs rather than just the most recent one reveals whether results are improving, declining, or flat : and that trend is what drives the next iteration decision.

Evidence

  • Project: projects/jobs-apply/_index : Run performance summary; reviewed last 3 run results and assessed overall pipeline health
  • Volume: 149 automated code-review sessions across projects

So What (Why Should You Care)

The run performance summary for projects/jobs-apply/_index demonstrates the value of reviewing the last 3 runs rather than just the most recent one. A single run can have an anomalous result : unusually high success rate on a good day, unusually low success rate due to a transient platform issue. Looking at three runs gives you a trend line. Is the success rate improving, declining, or flat? That trend is what drives the next iteration decision: fix the current approach, try a new approach, or scale the current approach.

Reviewing docs and Claude files before starting work on a familiar project is also a discipline worth noting explicitly. Even when you wrote the code last week, the state of a rapidly-changing project can shift significantly in a few days. The Claude file captures the current context that wasn’t obvious from the code alone. Reading it before starting prevents work that duplicates something already done or contradicts a decision already made.

What’s Next

Log

  • projects/jobs-apply/_index: summarized current state and last 3 run results; assessed pipeline health
  • Reviewed docs and Claude files for current project state
  • 149 automated code-review sessions across projects